Sunday, June 25, 2017

Software Engineering Maxim #2: Enthusiasm improves productivity.

(This is the second in a series of Software Engineering Maxims Which May or May Not Be True, developed over the last few years of working at Google. Your mileage may vary. Use only as directed. Past performance is not a predictor of future results. Etc.)

By far the best way to improve engineering productivity is to have people working on something which they are genuinely enthused about. It is beneficial in many ways:

  • the quality of the product will benefit from the care and attention
  • people don’t let themselves get blocked by something else when they are eager to see the end result
  • they’ll come up with ways to make the product even better, by way of their own resourcefulness
  • people are simply happier, which has numerous benefits in morale and working environment.

There are usually way more tasks on the project wish list than can realistically be delivered. Some of those tasks will be more important than others, but it is rarely the case that there is a strict priority order in the task list. More often we have broad buckets of tasks:

  • crucial, can’t have the product without it
  • nice to have
  • won’t do yet: too much crazy, or get to it eventually, or something

The crucial tasks have to be done, even the ones which no-one particularly wants to do.

In my mind, when selecting from the (lengthy) list of nice-to-have tasks, the enthusiasm of the engineering team should be a factor in the choices. The team will deliver more if they can work on things they are genuinely interested in doing.


Saturday, June 24, 2017

Software Engineering Maxim #1: Small teams are bigger than large teams

(This is the first in a series of Software Engineering Maxims Which May or May Not Be True, developed over the last few years of working at Google. Your mileage may vary. Use only as directed. Past performance is not a predictor of future results. Etc.)

In my mind, the ideal size for a software team is seven engineers. It does not have to be exactly seven: six is fine, eight is fine, but the further the team gets from the ideal the harder it is to get things done. Three people isn’t enough and limits impact, fourteen is too many to effectively coordinate and communicate amongst.

Organizing larger projects becomes an exercise in modularizing the system to allow teams of about seven people to own the delivery of a well-defined piece of the overall product. The largest parts of the system will end up with clusters of teams working on different aspects of the system.

Monday, June 12, 2017

Resurfacing

I've spent the last few years working as a software engineer and manager at Google Fiber. It was interesting work, but did not leave a lot of time for writing. As I now have more time available I'll make an effort to start writing again. I regret leaving it aside a few years ago.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

BangIP Option

We're almost out of IPv4 addresses, yet IPv6 deployment is still very, very slow. This is a recipe for disaster. I'm talking End of Internet predicted, film at 11 scale disaster. Something must be done. Steps must be taken.

I humbly suggest that the solution is really quite simple: re-use IPv4 addresses. I don't mean reclaiming IP addresses which have been allocated but are not actually being used. That is the kind of solution which sounds good and righteous to say but is completely unworkable in practice. Instead, I mean to simply issue the same IP address to multiple people.

"How could that possibly work?" people might ask. Go ahead, ask it... I'm glad that you asked, because I have a ready-made explanation waiting. We will leverage a solution to a similar problem which has scaled tremendously well over the last several decades: email addresses.

On early email systems like AOL, addresses had to be unique. This led to such ridiculous conventions as appending a number to the end of a popular address, like CompuGuy112673 (because really, everybody wants to have an email address like CompuGuy). The beauty of Internet email addressing is in breaking them up into a federated system, so compuguy@foo.com and compuguy@bar.com can simultaneously exist.

Therefore I propose to use this same solution for IP addressing. We will allow each Autonomous System to maintain its own IP address space. The same IP address can simultaneously exist within multiple ASNs. We are effectively adding a level of indirection to the destination in the IP header. Disambiguating the actual destination will be done via a new IP option.

IP Option field appended to frameBinary encoding of protocol headers is now passé. Therefore our new IP option is ASCII encoded, which also allows us to avoid the discussion about how Little Endian CPUs have won and all headers should be LE instead of BE. The content of the option is the destination IP address, followed by the '@' sign, followed by the decimal Autonomous System Number where the recipient can be reached. For example, a destination of 4.4.4.4 within the Level 3 network space would be "4.4.4.4@3356" using Level3's primary ASN of 3356.

By my reading of the IP spec the option field can be up to 40 bytes, while an IP@ASN encoding could require up to 15 bytes for the IP address, 1 byte for the @ symbol, and could handle billions of IP namespaces using only 13 more bytes to encode a 32 bit ASN. So, we should be good to go.


Updates to the DNS A record and all the application code which looks up IP addresses is left as an exercise for the reader.


For historical reasons, this new option is referred to as the BangIP option. An earlier version of this system used bang-separated IP addresses as a source routing path. That portion of the proposal has been deprecated, but we retain the name for its sentimental value.

Monday, March 26, 2012

On Octal

An article in the March 8 issue of the journal PLoS Computational Biology (as reported by Science Daily) states:

Upon pre-synaptic excitation, calcium ions entering post-synaptic neurons cause the snowflake-shaped CaMKII to transform, extending sets of 6 leg-like kinase domains above and below a central domain, the activated CaMKII resembling a double-sided insect. Each kinase domain can phosphorylate a substrate, and thus encode one bit of synaptic information. Ordered arrays of bits are termed bytes, and 6 kinase domains on one side of each CaMKII can thus phosphorylate and encode calcium-mediated synaptic inputs as 6-bit bytes.

From this we can derive one inescapable conclusion: DEC was right about octal all along.


(Thanks to Sean Hafeez for posting a link to the Science Daily article on Google+)